CO129-347 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1908 [4-6] — Page 75

F

ه گریه میرسد باز به خانه خور

Tiro 8880 5 noorette 97sqe e al creid *A tarit ad of unsea sobi

Bani aint no yea of over 1 dan

.to becocelís e ban co boftro ad

at død,moltotbalur Lastotno ob ea vision? od IIaw na antings

#0.

13.

73

Your Excellency says in paragraph 7 of your

letter that the Officer Administering the Government before

do mo duroɗs quiddos werd hd

*e den T saldw rolleeup a al

your arrival made the suggestion that the Puisne Judge should

ta Ioaned bartoonco "even Jassi

& ESTIU m) gebreed not theen gero a “nitte0

at IT Tadalyte bas Tottollen vi stod,Snow To Lasb iseng

nesob a svad nap 19jeitsi a tout onågartt of sidiconqal stiup

york? .ankton altramom & je Jusrugia tot visør beer aid at a9969

fie ob of avad stehnoit bne,erotnuį, tuonti, ered drow of 97BNÍ

lo soɛam: gribner,aonso qu ontdoo! ¡sevføarent wøgburb ord

sit gaiqede bus drommne duo patárlat od nattibbe ni、ereqsq

to ethos Te Ndiw hengyang að of eval erotiatioa art Bra .eeno

¡eprisið Terito nenob a bus sonsbiva do eston Kit!w atnenpoob

enotna bra,Vbest cakeenjiw kładð dag að ovan vont !Is ovods

ITAlið svig of at

ni dnsdrogmt word avond memotrin erit avond ortw

Ver vert te it on tion ot emoo ct ens tedd new stab baxit

BOLAO *** Jonnas triton end ¡yinmibronne enotterwjang 11953 sdam

anilist sat ca exso ʼn dote mt neva bna ¡eseaandhu ant juodttv

edit of gntwo barwood VIJп909* 28 sako grof a to siquornt

vlisoltostrq e! di econółw z Baw ow yɗnat .: to deseb nohbue

4

blow di siquodd yntreeri tot aanso tanto sonsvbs of eidiaeoqmi

ob of bertsozon asidrag (ls to ejes¬stal sɗð not eď vitnebive

take all the Bankruptcy work permanently, that Mr. Wise express-

-ød his willingness to do so, but that "I objected to the

proposed arrangement". Er. Wise informs me that the reasons

which induced me to object were stated to the Officer Administer-

-ing the Government at the time, but they do not seem to have

been reported to Your Excellency. My objections to the proposal

were these;»

(1). That the interference of the Government in the distri-

-bution of the work of the Court was objectionable in principle;

and that what was proposed in this instance was quite in-

-sufficient to deal effectively with the difficulty. If the

Government deals with the matter I am of opinion that it must

be fully and effectively dealt with, and not in piecemeal

fashion.

(2). That the fact that the proposal had been made implied

that I was incapable of dealing with the difficulty in so far

as re-arrangement of business could deal with it; and that it

was no new idea, but merely one that I was myself at that time

trying, as Mr. Wise had undertaken the Bankruptcy work of the

08

Court